|
|
Pontifex Contest 8 Results
|
|
|
|
Summary
Click on the images to download the bridges. Or just get all of them in one ZIP.
'Clean' bridges - total: 30
|
Cost
|
Name
|
Bridge
|
1 |
$55856 |
Nick |
|
Perfect optimization... |
2 |
$56620 |
Dragonspeare |
|
Done without using the bottom anchors... cool |
3 |
$57138 |
Hit-sch-me |
|
Reminds me of my own bridge :) |
4 |
$57545 |
CoG888 |
|
This seems to be the 'classic' design... |
5 |
$57860 |
Chillum |
|
A bit different, very nice |
6 |
$58152 |
Gernot |
|
Look at that deck... still clean :) |
7 |
$59191 |
Correns |
|
Pure cable-stayed one |
8 |
$59861 |
Gaff |
|
Nice bottom support |
9 |
$60594 |
Felix |
|
Left side is perfect, right side probably too expensive |
10 |
$61802 |
nwhitehe |
|
Cable-stayed, not bad |
11 |
$63952 |
VOiD81 |
|
Good, can be optimized further |
12 |
$64071 |
nearexistenZ |
|
Nice, too generous with cables |
13 |
$64217 |
Dogon1013 |
|
Cable web :) |
14 |
$64402 |
thyammat |
|
Doesn't use the center plane |
15 |
$64554 |
SiYkO |
|
Doesn't do that, either; must be the reason they're so close :) |
16 |
$66456 |
don_pez |
|
Really interesting mix |
17 |
$66588 |
Gabbler |
|
Another mixed-style one, nice |
18 |
$67290 |
greenT |
|
Lazy job on those cables |
19 |
$67450 |
Ranadious |
|
Ditto :) |
20 |
$69170 |
MortityNude |
|
Really good-looking |
21 |
$69370 |
hubs |
|
IMO too much heavy steel... |
22 |
$73662 |
John |
|
Simple & effective design |
23 |
$73942 |
McKay |
|
The same without the bottom anchor |
24 |
$76854 |
Laze Cannon |
|
Somewhat Bridge Builder-like |
25 |
$79152 |
Giftnudel |
|
The right side looks a bit overdone |
26 |
$86552 |
3of4 |
|
Nice, but not very cost-effective... |
27 |
$87716 |
Seb Gray |
|
Again, too many cables |
28 |
$91283 |
Lord Dark Rain |
|
Weird mixture :) |
29 |
$91558 |
Guilderoy |
|
I wouldn't wanna ride the train over this one, but it IS clean! :) |
30 |
$149884 |
thegreatpolla |
|
Big, red, very strong! |
'Dirty' bridges - total: 12
|
Cost
|
Name
|
Bridge
|
1 |
$48705 |
Dogon1013 |
|
The only one with this brilliant idea... |
2 |
$51420 |
Correns |
|
More or less 'classic' design, optimized to perfection |
3 |
$51622 |
Gernot |
|
Very very close... |
4 |
$51642 |
Nick |
|
The earliest-submitted of the 3 identical ones... |
5 |
$51642 |
Eraser |
|
The second one... |
6 |
$51642 |
nwhitehe |
|
The third one |
7 |
$51700 |
Chillum |
|
Yes, it IS ugly :) |
8 |
$54640 |
MortityNude |
|
The bottom anchor can be helpful, too |
9 |
$60626 |
greenT |
|
Kinda clean-looking suspension bridge:) |
10 |
$75540 |
McKay |
|
Cable-stayed variation |
11 |
$77664 |
Laze Cannon |
|
Too clean to be dirty :) |
12 |
$89569 |
Guilderoy |
|
Just a couple of broken links... |
'Artistic' bridges (sorted alphabetically by author name) - total: 13
Cost
|
Name
|
Bridge
|
$71596 |
Chillum |
|
That 5-deck-piece shape is everywhere :) |
$254648 |
CoG888 |
|
The big M |
$193339 |
Dogon1013 |
|
Cool skeleton of a... fish? dinosaur? :) |
$105808 |
Dragonspeare |
|
Elegant |
$194288 |
Felix |
|
Nice double-deck one, looks almost realistic |
$138416 |
Gernot |
|
Very artistic... |
$246806 |
Jim |
|
Looks nice from inside the train |
$796025 |
Laze Cannon |
|
A snow leopard! |
$186884 |
McKay |
|
I do think this looks like a whale. |
$108214 |
Morten Tvenge |
|
A HAV stunt bridge! Read the instructions! |
$120226 |
nwhitehe |
|
I see a nice fish here... |
$125407 |
Roo |
|
Cool 'infinity' design |
$199824 |
Sp66k |
|
See it? |
Disqualified
Cost
|
Name
|
Bridge
|
$62436 |
Enqrypzion |
|
Yeah, you overlooked something... The difficulty setting :( |
$135130 |
Genieser |
|
Artistic... Unfortunately, Genieser's bridges didn't reach me during the contest :( |
$55992 |
Genieser |
|
Clean... |
My own bridge
Cost
|
Name
|
Bridge
|
$56839 |
Gray |
|
A theoretical third place (fourth place counting Genieser's bridge)... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|