|
Cost
|
Name
|
Bridge
|
1 |
$55544 |
Genieser |
|
Innovative & brilliant |
2 |
$56172 |
Gernot |
|
Classical & effective |
3 |
$58623 |
Eraser |
|
Pink but still great :) |
4 |
$59220 |
Dragonspeare |
|
Nothing groundbreaking, just cost-effective |
5 |
$59220 |
Nick |
|
The above two are practically identical! What a coincidence... |
6 |
$59714 |
sKiS |
|
The best cable-stayed bridge, smooth ride. Not bad! |
7 |
$59898 |
Argonut |
|
Nice center part, good one |
8 |
$65896 |
Dogon1013 |
|
Cool v-shapes, almost-smooth ride |
9 |
$67636 |
Gaff |
|
Good concept, can be improved... |
10 |
$68430 |
Cog888 |
|
Another cable-stayed one, very nice |
11 |
$68508 |
Chris G |
|
Best no-cable solution! |
12 |
$68836 |
Laze Cannon |
|
A hybrid solution, not bad |
13 |
$73318 |
Jim |
|
It's all in the mix |
14 |
$73900 |
Chaffinch |
|
A special custom concept |
15 |
$76816 |
Hubs |
|
A wide variety of elements combined |
16 |
$78006 |
MART.ini |
|
Lots of steel and a bit of cable |
17 |
$79512 |
JC |
|
A pair of diamonds and a lot of symmetry |
18 |
$80104 |
Seb Gray |
|
The light-steel-only solution! |
19 |
$81584 |
Kilroy |
|
Something about this one reminds me of Bridge Builder :) |
20 |
$84540 |
Lord Dark Rain |
|
Breaks 1 link on fast, but doesn't on normal speed! |
21 |
$85264 |
James M |
|
Semi-cable-stayed without using the upper anchors |
22 |
$90560 |
Jim C |
|
The 'nothing fancy' cable-stayed one |
23 |
$92560 |
Drew |
|
Same bridge plus some crossbeams... suspicious... :) |
24 |
$92586 |
JTR |
|
Very nice, fluid geometry |
25 |
$94728 |
greenT |
|
Another mix of several concepts |
26 |
$98982 |
Chrid |
|
An elegant cable-stayed arch |